 |
| Search |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
![[Case Highlight]](img/sidebar/title-highlight.gif) |
 |
 |
 |
![[Name]](img/highlight/case-name.gif) |
| Shi Tao |
 |
![[Offense]](img/highlight/case-offense.gif) |
| Illegally providing state secrets |
 |
![[Release Date]](img/highlight/case-release.gif) |
| November 23, 2014 |
 |
![[More Info]](img/utils/more-info_trans.gif) |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Looking Back at Cancun and Forward to Hong Kong
[First printed in China Rights Forum, No.4 2003]
HRIC representatives Sharon Hom and Jennifer Rockwitz attended the WTO Ministerial Conference in Cancun in September to monitor and highlight multilateral trade and labor issues relevant to China.
WTO Trends and China
As a newly admitted World Trade
Organization (WTO) member (December,
2001), China attended its first WTO
Ministerial Conference, the Fifth WTO
Ministerial held in Cancun from September
10-14, 2003. The Ministerial Conference,
held at least every two years, is the highest
decision-making body of the WTO. China's
15-year bid and final accession to this global
body was accompanied by hopeful expectations
regarding the impact of membership
in a multilateral rules-based system
on greater transparency, openness and
accountability in China's emerging legal
system. As China nears its second year of
WTO membership, assessments of its
progress in implementing its WTO commitments
reflect the complexity of the challenges
and suggest mixed success.
However, in addition to assessing the
WTO's impact on China, the importance of
monitoring and assessing China's impact
on these multilateral fora is also becoming
increasingly clear. In light of the progressive
expansion in the scope of the WTO,
the inclusion of "non-trade" concerns and
the greater inclusion of non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and other civil society
stakeholders, it is important to ensure that
China does not use its substantial economic
and political power as a negative influence
on these debates and decision-making
processes. Guided by core principles of
non-discrimination, transparency and rule
of law, the international trade regime that
makes up the WTO has expanded from its
original focus on tariffs and trade in goods
to now including rules on trade in services
and intellectual property. At the same time,
"non-trade" concerns and issues such as
sustainable development, environment and
poverty alleviation have been incorporated
into the WTO's agenda, negotiations and
discussions.
These developments have not been
without controversy, and debates continue
regarding their appropriateness and scope.
Governments from developing countries
point to the need for trade policies to be
responsive to the needs of all the WTO
members, and not just the narrow economic
interests of the developed countries.
They have largely opposed the investment
agenda ("Singapore issues"—investment,
competition, government procurement and
trade facilitation) pushed by the EU,
Canada, Japan and the U.S.
Human rights, labor and environmental
NGOs argue that trade is not an end in
itself but a tool for sustainable and equitable
development, and that these goals
must be operationalized and factored into
economic and trade policies. Sustainable
and equitable trade policies must take into
account the human rights-related impacts
of trade policies because failure to do so
results in incomplete and irrational policies.
HRIC at the Fifth Ministerial Conference
Beginning in 1996, WTO members agreed
to expanded guidelines permitting NGOs to
attend Ministerial Conferences and participate
in issue-specific symposia, facilitating
day-to day contact between the WTO
Secretariat and NGOs, and launching a
range of specific initiatives designed to
improve dialogue between the WTO and
civil society. In order to receive accreditation
for the Ministerial Conferences, NGOs
have to demonstrate that their work is
"concerned with matters related to those
of the WTO." In August 2003 HRIC applied
for and received accreditation as an NGO
observer to the Fifth Ministerial in Cancun.
As part of HRIC's five-year research,
monitoring and advocacy strategy,
Incorporating Responsibility 2008, HRIC's
WTO intervention aimed to raise specific
human rights and trade issues in the context
of China, and broader issues of NGO
and civil society participation in WTO bodies
and processes. As an independent
Chinese human rights organization, HRIC is
particularly concerned with issues that
present challenges for the implementation
of WTO obligations and their impact on sustainable
development, poverty alleviation
and rule of law. As part of its research and
advocacy work, HRIC carefully monitors the
legal reforms necessary for compliance
with WTO accession protocols that promote
the WTO goals of transparency and non-discrimination.
HRIC also viewed attendance
at the WTO Ministerial as an opportunity to
observe the Ministerial Conference and
develop greater technical understanding of
WTO processes, member obligations and
the role of NGOs and civil society actors.
In addition to attending a wide range of
briefings by NGOs, the WTO Secretariat and
country delegations, HRIC and Fédération
Internationale des ligues des Droits de
l'homme (FIDH) co-convened a "China and
the WTO" roundtable, which engaged
human rights and trade experts from legal,
academic and non-governmental organizations.
The roundtable examined the impact
of China's first year implementation of WTO
obligations on sustainable and equitable
development, and explored the serious
social and human rights problems in China
that have been exacerbated or created by
China's accession to the WTO. The roundtable
focused on agriculture, human rights
and business in China, labor rights, corporate
responsibility and legal reforms. The
participants included moderator Sharon
Hom, Executive Director of HRIC; Marie
Guirard and Antoine Madelin from FIDH;
Stuart Clark, Senior Policy Advisor at the
Canadian Foodgrains Bank; Neil Kearney of
the International Confederation of Free
Trade Unions; David Petrasek, Senior Policy
Advisor at Amnesty International; and
Mattheo Bushehri, Professor of Law at
Hong Kong University.
Approximately 20 people from a broad
range of constituencies attended the
roundtable, including a Senior Policy
Advisor of the Trade Union Advisory
Committee to the OECD; press; human
rights NGOs, including Rights and
Democracy, Amnesty International and the
World Organization Against Torture; a delegate
from the Canadian Pork Council; and a
delegate from the Turkish Business
Association. With a view towards promoting
an expanded role for NGOs at the WTO,
FIDH circulated a proposal in Cancun advocating
NGO consultative status for general
interest NGOs in formal WTO processes,arguing that UN bodies, the OECD and the
ILO have already acknowledged the expert
role of NGOs in consultative mechanisms.
In addition to the roundtable, HRIC also
participated in the emerging NGO human
rights caucus, which included representatives
from FIDH, Amnesty International,
Rights and Democracy, International NGO
Committee on Human Rights in Trade &
Investment (INCHRITI),World Organization
Against Torture, the Argentina-based
Center for Human Rights and Environment
and the Canadian Environmental Law
Association. After extensive discussions,
the Caucus issued a strong statement
underscoring the critical human right to
adequate food.
HRIC also attended multiple NGO briefings
to learn about other organizations'
strategies in attacking human rights issues
in the trade arena. The key briefings HRIC
attended included a teach-in co-convened
by INCHRITI and the Lutheran World
Federation; a panel organized by Rights
and Democracy, whose key speakers
included former High Commissioner for
Human Rights Mary Robinson and Paul
Hunt, the Special Rapporteur on the Right
to Health; and an Oxfam-sponsored briefing
by two mainland Chinese researchers, who
focused on the effects of accession to the
WTO on China's sugar and automobile
industries.
HRIC representatives also made an
hour-long trip, maneuvering Mexican security
barriers along the way, to downtown
Cancun to participate in a candlelight vigil
organized by the colleagues of Kun Hai
Lee, a North Korean farmer who committed
suicide on the opening day of the
Ministerial. Beyond the wire-mesh fences
and armed police rimming the hotel zone, a
few hundred Via Campesina supporters,
NGOs, local citizens and the press joined
the vigil, calling for greater accountability in
the WTO to ensure sustainable and equitable
development in poor countries. As
each person reached the barricades, he or
she silently placed a white flower into the
wire openings, creating a wall of white blossoms
lit by candles placed atop the fences.
The security forces peered from behind riot
equipment on the other side of the concrete
barriers. It was a powerful statement
about inclusion and exclusion.
The Cancun negotiations dramatically
collapsed when developed countries
refused to make concessions on agricultural
subsidies, and developing countries from
the African, Caribbean and Pacific regions
rejected a call from the EU, Japan and others
for new rules on the Singapore issues.
Looking Ahead to 2005
On October 21, 2003, the WTO members
accepted Hong Kong's offer to host the
Sixth Ministerial Conference. While members
postponed a decision on the date, the
next Conference will have to take place
before the end of 2005 according to
requirements in the founding charter, the
WTO Agreement, that Ministerial
Conferences be held at least once every
two years.
While China retained a relatively low
profile at its first WTO Ministerial, it will
move center stage when Hong Kong hosts
the Sixth Ministerial in 2005. Although as a
Special Administrative Region Hong Kong
is technically a separate trade territory,
China will undoubtedly be exerting its influence
on security measures, access and
visa arrangements and NGO accreditation.
In light of China's past record on these
issues, it is very important for NGOs, the
media and civil society actors to monitor
and participate in the planning processes
to ensure full access and transparency.
According to the WTO Web site, the Fifth
Ministerial attracted a record number of
NGO participants, with nearly 800 organizations
and 1,600 of their representatives
taking part, an almost eightfold jump since
the first Ministerial in 1996 with just 235
registered participants. However, NGOs
had to grapple with a number of procedural
constraints and logistical difficulties. Due
to the massive number of applications for
NGO accreditation, the WTO decided to
place limits on both the numbers of representatives
an NGO could register (a maximum
of three) and the number of people
from the NGO who could have access to
the Cancun Convention Center where formal
trade negotiations took place (only one
representative at a time). Because only
accredited NGOs could access the NGO
Center, non-accredited NGOs were prohibited
from participating in NGO roundtables,
discussions and briefings unless specific
exceptions were made.
The logistical difficulties in Cancun were
further exacerbated by the lack of materials
available to NGOs in a timely manner.
Government delegations did not consistently
post briefing times or hold regular
briefings in areas readily accessible to all
groups. Part of this can be attributed to the
unequal resources of government delegations.
For example, the U.S. delegation listed
almost 200 members while some poor
countries sent only a single delegate.
As the planning and negotiations for the
next Ministerial move forward, it is important
for NGOs to pay close attention to:
| Accreditation and Access: |
In light of
China's attitude toward individuals or
groups it views as critical of its policies or
practices, attention must be given to possible
politicization of the accreditation and
visa issuance process. The process for
review of NGO observer applications needs
to be fully transparent. Any objections by
any WTO member to the approval of any
particular applicant, as well as the reasons
for objections, should be disclosed to the
affected NGO and also posted on the WTO
Web site.
|
| Security Measures: |
Security arrangements
for the Hong Kong Ministerial must
be carefully reviewed to ensure that an
appropriate balance is struck between
security concerns and access by civil society
stakeholders. Furthermore, the level of
security and the role and authority of security
forces need to be carefully delineated
in advance and monitored during the
Ministerial. The authorities must not be
allowed to use security concerns as a pretext
for suppressing legitimate free expression
and the exercise of other fundamental
human rights.
|
The WTO has been progressively opening
up to allow greater inclusion of civil
society stakeholders and greater transparency
in its decision-making processes.
Hong Kong 2005 will be a test of the WTO's
commitments to even more rational and
inclusive processes. It will also be a test of
the kind of citizen China will choose to be
as it increasingly integrates into the global
community.
|
|